* * Hysteria.
Written by Stephen Dyer & Jonah Lisa Dyer, based on a story by Howard
Gensler. Directed by Tanya Wexler
Pryce, Everett and Dancy prepare to explore inner space. |
Bill Clinton was
criticized for asking what the meaning of "is" is, but there’s powerful
use in defining our way out of certain awkwardnesses. Consider the antique
malady known as hysteria—the supposed
excess of "wombiness" in women that led to symptoms like anxiety,
lethargy, and moodiness. For centuries, the condition was widely diagnosed in
lonely, dissatisfied females, and the preferred treatment was direct massage of
the genitalia by the lubed-up digits of a doctor. Though the procedure often
led to what was politely known as "paroxysms", to the housewives,
spinsters, nuns and grandmothers involved there was nothing sexual about it. As
their doctors assured them, proper female pleasure--strictly defined--was only
possible with the introduction of the male member. By the late 19th century, some
well-to-do women were indulging in these therapeutic paroxysms several times a
week.
There's a good movie in the absurdity of all this.
Unfortunately, Tanya Wexler's Hysteria
isn't it. Even for an experienced director (which Wexler, in her first major
feature, is not), finding the right tone for this subject couldn't have been
easy. The easiest choice is to make a joke of it--- always tempting when
matters of sex are broached in Victorian circumstances. But there are real
issues here too, having to do with centuries of ignorance, suspicion and
outright repression of women's bodies. Wexler wants to hint at these things too,
but ends up with a movie that is neither particularly funny, nor particularly
meaningful. Watching it, we feel mildly stimulated, but never enough to bring
us to a state of pleasure.
The story concerns one Mortimer Granville (Hugh Dancy), a young physician so earnestly progressive
in his craft that he talks himself out of several jobs. Desperate, he ends up
in the practice of Dr. Robert Dalrymple (Jonathan Pryce), a specialist in the
kind of prestidigitation prescribed for hysteria. Granville turns out to have
the magic touch, too, but long hours at what Dalrymple calls “exacting, tedious
work” leaves him with the horse-and-buggy equivalent of carpal tunnel syndrome. Looking
into the abyss of unemployment again, Granville turns for help to his friend Edmund
St. John-Smythe (Rupert Everett), an idle-rich, barely-closeted homosexual with
a passion for the new science of electricity. The offspring of necessity is
“Granville’s Hammer”, the first “electro-vibrator” for home use.
Wexler seems to had in mind a movie much like The Road to Wellville (1994), the quirky
history of Dr. John Harvey Kellogg as interpreted by T. Coraghessan Boyle. That
wasn’t a particularly good movie either, but at least featured a crazed
performance by Anthony Hopkins as the celebrated breakfast cereal pioneer.
Dancy’s Granville, by comparison, is a pretty sticky wicket, so dully
conventional that we wonder if he’s ever had a paroxysm himself. The reason for
the flat portrayal is obvious, of course: if the doctor derived any pleasure
from his work, he might seem creepy. And between creepy doctors and dull ones, most
of us go with the latter.
What fireworks there are in this movie are provided by Maggie
Gyllenhaal as Dr. Dalrymple’s eldest daughter, Charlotte. She’s supposed to be
an enjoyably spunky suffragette, but Gyllenhaal comes off more screechily
annoying than appealing. Somehow, the straitlaced Granville is supposed to find
her unconventionality more attractive than her quiet, brainy sister Emily
(Felicity Jones). But in the game of movie expectations, Gyllenhaal is actually
the more predictable choice. And by having her disparage the work of her
father and Granville, the script manages to do exactly what the Victorians
did—marginalize and dismiss female sexuality. Hysteria is one of those strange cases where a movie implores us to
take seriously a subject it doesn’t take seriously itself.
The best part of this movie comes during the closing credits, when we get images of antique vibrators
through history. Some of these look like real power tools, so chunky and
lethal-looking they should have STANLEY printed on their sides. Then, as now,
serious work demands substantial tools.
© 2012 Nicholas Nicastro
Thanks for the review Nick, always fun and interesting to read your movie reviews.
ReplyDelete