Washington is unstoppable in Flight. |
«««« Flight. Written by John Gatins. Directed by Robert Zemeckis.
They say you won’t be seeing Robert Zemeckis’ terrific Flight as an in-flight movie. Given the subject matter, it’s understandable, but still sad, for Flight is well worth seeing under any circumstances. We’ve spent the better part of a year watching Hollywood try to prove that scripts and characters aren’t enough to carry a movie—and juvenilize its audiences with effects pictures and too-clever cartoons. Flight is a reminder that there’s still room for functioning adults at the multiplex.
“Functioning adult” may be a generous way
to describe William “Whip” Whittaker (Denzel Washington). Divorcee, estranged
father, and gifted pilot, Whip can only get through his job with the help of
booze and coke. Bad as that maybe sounds, it works for him: on the day we meet
him, he coolly pilots a plane full of 100 passengers through a nasty storm
before his first drink. Three vodkas later, he guides his flight to a crash
landing, “Sully” Sullenberger-style, after a mechanical failure takes out his
hydraulics. Instead of a hundred fatalities, there are only six.
So he’s a hero, right? In John Gatins’ sharp,
wise script, we see the other, less sweet side of heroism, as his sudden fame
brings scrutiny that threatens to rip the mask off Whip’s personal charade. He
can land any plane, but can he avoid crash and burning his unlikely
relationship with Nicole (the ethereal Kelly Reilly), a heroin addict and
certified pistol who sees right through the creaking machinery holding him
together?
This is an oddly character-driven drama
for Zemeckis, the guy who’s given us Back
to the Future, Polar Express, the
CGI-gimmicky Beowulf and A Christmas Carol—and Forrest Gump, the movie that almost
single-handedly made intellectual mediocrity a virtue in this American life.
There’s such justice given to the sophistication of Gatins’ script, and such
scope for Washington’s acting, that we have to wonder what other great films haven’t gotten made because Zemeckis has
been so busy juvenilizing not only audiences, but himself. (His next project,
alas, is a 3-D remake of Yellow Submarine.)
Washington is just about perfect for this
role, and he does it in a way that is typically his. That is to say, Washington
is not a great actor in the way Daniel Day-Lewis or Meryl Streep are, by
utterly vanishing into their roles. Playing the blue collar hero in Unstoppable, or the haunted soldier he
did in Uncommon Valor, he’s always pretty
much himself. Much like Morgan Freeman, he somehow manages to be utterly
believable as he assimilates his roles into his own particular personality. I
bought him so much in this role, I want Denzel Washington’s voice to come over
the intercom on my next white-knuckle flight.
It’s not a spoiler to say that Whip isn’t
just an addict or a hero—he’s both.
That’s easy to say, of course, but hard to get away with in practice.
Notwithstanding anti-hero TV shows like Breaking
Bad, we still tend like our categories neat, hero or zero. Joe Paterno is
either a legend or a moral embarrassment; Barack Obama either saved our
economy, or flew it into the ground. Admittedly, Flight gets away with this ambiguity because, you know, it’s Denzel in the pilot seat. Would this
story have worked so well with an equally talented but less likeable actor in
the lead? I’d like to give audiences enough credit to say “yes”. But I’d lying
if I said I was sure.
© 2012 Nicholas
Nicastro
No comments:
Post a Comment